We've all heard about 5G in the news, how it's coming, how it will be a huge advance in technology and how it will bring about big changes in how we connect with the world and each other. It sounds so great and it's all the buzz about how it will bring about great changes in our lives. But is this a good thing or another assault on our privacy and health?

When we look at 5G we see that the term means different things depending on the carrier. Verizon has 5G that is very fast with download speeds up to one gigabyte per second. That's an incredible ten times faster than most wi-fi connections. However, the coverage so far is spotty and you can't count on maintaining the fast connection on the street and it's virtually non-existent in the home. Again 5G as it is being used right now can't travel very far and is blocked by walls and foliage so in order to achieve a city-wide roll out there would need to be nodes for coverage on every block. Verizon plans to turn on a low-band 5G network to increase coverage but the speeds won't be much faster than a regular LTE phone used today. 

AT&T and T-Mobile's low-band networks are in the 600 megahertz and 850 megahertz bands, effectively the same area of spectrum as existing LTE however, they're new bands of spectrum that aren't already clogged up with existing customers. These use new transmission technologies which means that these low-band 5G networks can offer faster speeds than LTE even though they're basically using the same spectrum bands as LTE. They can transmit over a much wider range than other types of 5G and that's why T-Mobile can claim to have nationwide 5G coverage. 

T-Mobile now owns Sprint and these use mid-band 5G located at the 2.5 gigahertz range of the spectrum. This is faster than low-band 5G, about the same area of the electromagnetic spectrum as your home wifi. Midband is higher frequency and more bandwidth than low-band 5G, however it's far slower than millimeter wave, which is the ultra-fast 5G.

What we are calling millimeter wave is at about 30 gigahertz, much higher frequency than any other types of 5G and offers blazing fast speeds. These are being used by Verizon and in limited areas, T-Mobile, and AT&T. These radio waves are between one and 10 millimeters in wavelength and do not pass through objects like walls or buildings easily which means that the range is very limited.

The changes in the usage of bandwidth are interesting but only part of the story. Other improvements in 5G, come from new transmission technology and techniques to improve connectivity. Carrier aggregation combines multiple LTE bands into one data stream for faster speeds, and MIMO antennas, or multiple inputs multiple outputs, use antenna arrays, made up of lots of little antennas stationed at intervals for improved connectivity.

Is the 5G rollout a bad human experiment?

 

A revolution is underway in the 5G rollout, but some think it's more an experiment that will affect billions of people. 5G stands for 5th generation mobile data services and the internet will be faster than ever. This is what the Internet of Things should make possible: Intelligent, driverless cars and smart hospitals, smart fridges, thermostats, and coffee machines. Downloading a high definition movie should only take seconds. By 2025 the European Commission plans to ensure that all urban areas on the continent are provided with 5G across the board. But is there a price we will pay for this service?

What the citizens are not being told is for it to be viable a large number of new antennas need to be erected: in our residential areas, at our workplaces, even at home. Is cell phone radiation dangerous? Science is divided over this. Some experts claim it is safe; Others deny that. In 2011 the World Health Organization classified electromagnetic fields associated with cell phones as "possibly carcinogenic for humans", and studies published in 2018 showed that in rats exposed to such fields, the risk of certain types of cancer increased. Even among those who believe the technology is safe, many feel that more research is needed. There are almost no studies at all for 5G. The companies in the telecommunications industry themselves declare: "Electromagnetic signals can harbor health risks".

So, why are the EU Commission and the U.S. ignoring the warnings? They refer to guidelines drawn up by international scientific committees, but Investigate Europe found out: These bodies are a closed club: professionals with dissenting opinions are not allowed. A significant part of the scientists involved was also funded by companies involved in the 5G rollout.

252 electromagnetic field (EMF) scientists from 43 countries, all with published peer-reviewed research on the biological and health effects of nonionizing electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) have stated that:

‘Numerous recent scientific publications have shown that RF-EMF affects living organisms at levels well below most international and national guidelines. Effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increase in harmful free radicals, genetic damages, structural and functional changes of the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological disorders, and negative impacts on general well-being in humans. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is growing evidence of harmful effects to both plant and animal life’ (30).

5G Linked to Significant Health Concerns

In 2015, more than 230 scientists engaged in the study of biological and health effects of non-ionizing EMFs in 41 nations signed an international appeal to the United Nations, calling for protection from non-ionizing EMF exposure due to evidence of health effects even at low levels.29

Two years later, more than 180 doctors and scientists from 35 countries signed a petition30 to enact a moratorium on the rollout of 5G due to the potential risks to wildlife and human health, citing research showing an increased risk for:

• Cancer
• Cellular stress and increase in harmful free radicals
• Genetic damage
• Reproductive problems31,32,33
• Neurological disorders

News About 5G and Your Health

What Science Says About 5G

A 2-page fact sheet19 on 5G can be downloaded from the Environmental Health Trust’s website. There, you can also access a long list of published scientific studies showing cause for concern.20 Remember, 5G will result in an exponential increase in RFR exposure, and there are already thousands of studies demonstrating biological effects from low-intensity electromagnetic fields (EMFs).

More than 1,800 studies summarized in the BioInitiative Report21 (2007 and 2012) show immune system effects, neurological effects, cognitive effects and much more. For example, cumulative daily EMF exposure from cellphones and Wi-Fi is associated with cancer,22,23 altered brain development in children and reproductive damage in both sexes.

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2019/11/13/5g-emf-exposure.aspx

Latest News On Harmful Effects Of EMF Exposure

This article from Dr. Mercola explains some recent research into the effects of EMF on the Mitochondria and how calcium builds up in your cells due to electromagnetic exposure. He interviews Dr. Martin Paul and here you will learn about the ways EMF can affect you.

By Dr. Mercola

I’ve often noted that electromagnetic fields (EMFs) are a pernicious, hidden health risk. But exactly how does this kind of microwave radiation damage your health? Martin Pall, Ph.D., has identified and published research describing the likely molecular mechanisms of how EMFs from cellphones and wireless technologies damage plants, animals and humans.1,2 ,3,4

Pall has a bachelor’s in physics from Johns Hopkins and a Ph.D. in biochemistry and genetics from Caltech, and is uniquely qualified for this type of research. For the past 18 years, he’s been scouring the medical literature, integrating and drawing parallels between work done by others to answer this pressing question.

Learn more from this interview here:

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/09/03/electromagnetic-fields-harmful-effects.aspx?utm_source=dnl&utm_medium=email&utm_content=art1&utm_campaign=20170903Z1&et_cid=DM157353&et_rid=38683370

The debate over Cell Phone Radiation continues. 

This article from Dr. Mercola discusses cell phone dangers and another concern about the emissions coming from your mobile device.

• Exposure to cellphone radiation may or may not increase your risk of brain tumor formation, but this is a minor risk compared to damage done by free radicals from peroxynitrites that radically impair mitochondrial function
• Science has linked exposure to peroxynitrites from low-frequency microwave radiation emitted from cellphones and Wi-Fi networks with chronic diseases such as heart disease, obesity and inflammatory bowel disease
• You can reduce your exposure by shutting off your Wi-Fi at night, keeping cellphones in airplane mode unless using them, using the speaker phone and using a selfie stick when talking on it

The Debate Over Brain Tumors and Cellphone Exposure Continues

An Italian court recently weighed in on the debate over cellphone use and the development of brain tumors when they found in favor of a longtime telecommunication employee, Roberto Romeo, who claimed a benign brain tumor resulted in hearing loss in one ear.6Interestingly, both Romeo7 and his attorney made reference to inappropriate use of a cellphone that led to the development of the tumor. Romeo reportedly used his cellphone for three hours a day over 15 years while doing his job for the mobile phone company.

Check out some ways to protect yourself from harmful radiation with the latest technology by adding a simple device to the back of your cellphone here:

Radiation Protection

There is increasing evidence of harm coming from our cell phones and other mobile devices. Check out this latest news from Dr. Mercola here:

http://everlast.mercola.com/r/?id=h7832c037,12bc3107,12ca0799&et_cid=DM146871&et_rid=2016591927

Protection Against EMF!

As the world changes and we keep adding electronic devices to our everyday lives, the amount of electric pollution keeps adding up. Wouldn't you like to see a product that can:

• Reduce magnetic field gradients
• Defend against changes in your blood profile
• Lower your body’s stress levels

Here are some of the benefits that you will get from the new product.

The microchip is small and discreet, but is packed with incredible technology. Backed by real scientific testing, this device uses the latest innovations in layered thin chip technology to actively protect your body against electronic and mobile radiation.

Active phone calls create a low-frequency electromagnetic field in close vicinity to the cell phone. However, its levels are inconsistent: it contains gaps and peaks, which are called gradients. Our unit disassembles these peaks into smooth progressions that make the electromagnetic fields tolerable for our bodies.

Tests that were conducted after a 10 minute telephone call without this, and they showed modifications in the blood count (a modified hematopoietic): the blood cells stuck together. It is likely that the surrounding water protection shield or the blood cells themselves lost polarization due to the negative impact of the conflicting magnetic field.

In contrast, the same test that was carried out after a 10 minute phone call with the new shield, and did not show any changes in the blood count.

Sometimes the best things come in small packages.

This new designed microchip is small and discreet, but is packed with incredible technology. Backed by real scientific testing, this device used the latest innovations in layered thin chip technology to actively protect your body against electronic and mobile radiation.

Check out the latest in electro-smog protection here!

Latest Cell Phone Danger Report

The news about cell phone danger has been ongoing. In May 2011, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), declared cell phones a Group 2B 'Possible Carcinogen,' meaning a "possible cancer-causing agent," based on the available research. 

In this article from Dr. Mercola, he has updated his posts about EMF problems with some findings recently published about the effects of cell phone radiation.

Latest Radio frequency Study — A Wake Up Call for Cell Phone Hazard Deniers?

Despite such findings, cell phones have become increasingly pervasive and such a common part of our daily lives that most people never think twice about using them and carrying them on their body all day long.

Some do exercise caution, using speakerphone or texting, for instance, instead of holding the phone up to their ear (and right next to their brain), but many still refuse to believe the risks are real.

Alas, researchers have demonstrated that wireless phones and other gadgets have the potential to cause all sorts of health problems, from headaches to brain tumors, with young children being at greatest risk.

In fact, 72 percent of industry-funded studies have failed to discern any biological effect from cell phone radiation exposure, whereas 67 percent of independent studies (those not funded by industry) did find biological effects.3

For example, by 1990, before there even was a consumer cell phone industry, at least two dozen epidemiological studies on humans indicated a link between electromagnetic fields (EMF) and/or radio frequencies (RF) and serious health problems, including childhood leukemia.

More at:

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2016/06/15/cell-phone-radiation-effects.aspx

Can You Neutralize EMF?

Guard Against Emf!

This is some very interesting information brought to your by Natures Energies. Not all Electromagnetic Radiation can be harmonized by many devices that are being sold for such purpose. Check out this article to learn more.

The remedy to electromagnetic radiation (EMR) - should we select shielding or should we modify the radiation we are exposed to?

For over 20 years, we have examined various devices which manufacturers claim either shields or alters EMR, making it safer for the body. In the 1990s a compound called orgonite was developed and it was found to produce orgone energy, and partially lowered the dangerous effects of radiation. Various devices such as pyramids and pendants were made into various artistic pieces and were found at various shows, websites and in some specialty stores. Over time, geomancers with a more sensitive nature concluded that orgonite caused more harm than good, yet these products are still sold globally and manufacturers are unaware of the potential dangers of orgonite thinking they are doing more good than harm. Our own observations led us to the devices produced by Gerard Bini, the developer of a group of products programmed and infused with energy which he calls orgonium. Gerard's devices in our opinion are the most effective, and the safest products on the market globally, and we receive positive feedback regarding his products regularly. We are very happy to have the privilege in dealing with Gerard and there are no other products which come even close to his.

In the last year or so, we have had many people writing to us saying that they have purchased a geoclense, and when they use an EMF meter to check for radiation levels, there is no change whatsoever. They often question is the unit working at all? The answer is yes! A geoclense will not actually shield radiation, but it will alter the frequency making it safer for human organs (in fact so safe there is no negative effect on the body whatsoever which is scientifically confirmed by medical diagnostic equipment such as bicom, MORA, and Orion Electro Dermal Biofeedback which measures stress on organs).

Some people have compared the geoclense with an EMR radiation shield, and observation shows that the shield lowers radiation, but NEVER clears it completely. A shield will work "diluting" the radiation by spreading it, and thus lowering the guass, or EMR concentration, and this is shown on an EMF meter. The problem is that it might be lowered, but it is still at a dangerous frequency to the human body. This is confirmed by kinesiologists through simple tests. Beware of cowboys or professors armed with EMF meters as they are leading to scientific conclusions, but we can show that the lowered radiation levels are still dangerous to our health.

The other point is where there has been a source of EMR, and when that source has been removed, there is always an imprint which remains. This can be shown by switching on a toaster in an area where it is not normally used. Feel the area with your hand before you place the toaster in a specific area, switch it on, leave it for a while then switch it off and then remove the toaster from that area. Feel the area where the toaster was switched on and feel the subtle difference with your hand - the area that you feel is known as an imprint. A geoclense is the ONLY device known that can remove such imprints.

The conclusion is that it is not possible to completely block radiation (unless we go to extraordinary steps), but we can alter the radiation making it completely safe to the human body. This is possible using the devices available through Natures Energies. Particularly thegeoclense, the Schumann generators, the area neutralizer as well as the orgone pendant and phone harmonizers which are all orgonium products.

There are many products that claim to help when considering Electromagnetic Radiation by not all are what they claim to be. You can do some simple test to determine if they are effective. A strength test will show you if your energy is being tapped or enhanced by these devices. Guard yourself against this unseen danger!

News About Smart Meters

Today's article from Smart Planet addresses the ongoing debate about Smart Meter Safety. The many concerns about fires, radiation, and security are discussed and some different insights are presented.

Smartplanet

The Morning Briefing: Are smart meters dangerous?

By Charlie Osborne | September 7, 2012, 12:45 AM PDT

1.) ComEd: Smart meter installation causes three area house fires. The installation of smart meters, the devices promising customers real-time information about peak electricity use, has caused three small fires in area homes, ComEd has confirmed.

2.) Top 6 common myths about smart meter danger exposed. There’s a lot of talk about smart meters and how they can help communities use power more efficiently, conserving energy and thus reducing costs. However, some claim that smart meters are hazardous to human health, emitting dangerous high frequency radio waves that can cause illness and disease.

3.) Risk of smart grid security breaches higher than ever. It’s no secret that cyber security is an integral part of the smart grid, but utilities and regulators are continuing to grapple with the best way to fortify themselves against the expanding host of cyber threats.

4.) Fire concerns over smart meters appear overblown. About 35 people die in fires in British Columbia every year, most of which could have been prevented. So the fact that at least two fires broke out in homes after the installation of smart meters is a concern. British Columbians have a right to expect that the installation of the new meters is making them safer, not put-ting them at greater risk.

5.) Smart meters too toxic to touch. It is perhaps the biggest single public policy failure in the energy sector of the past decade - mandated smart meters which are being introduced in Victoria. With the cost of the roll-out now estimated at more than $2 billion - more than twice the initial estimated cost — it has added another lucrative profit source to the activities of the power distributors.

See article at:http://www.smartplanet.com/blog/bulletin/the-morning-briefing-are-smart-meters-dangerous/154?tag=nl.e660&s_cid=e660

Like many such articles the facts about health issues are poorly researched and little understood. Electromagnetic radiation is a real health concern and should not be dismissed as easily as the power industry would like. The other issues that surround the mandatory installation of Smart Meters are also a valid concern and should be noted by all citizens that could possibly be affected.

Electromagnetic Radiation Exposure

So the question that arises is: How do you know if your getting too much Electromagnetic Radiation exposure? There are conflicting ideas about levels of exposure and whether or not they affect health. Here's some info about different guidelines that currently exist. 

From Alternative Magnetic Therapy . com

How much EMF exposure is too much for you?

The medical and electric power communities have differing views on EMF exposure health effects. But they all agree on one thing: There is no minimum daily requirement for EMF.

In other words, no amount of EMF exposure can be considered safe. However, some voluntary guidelines exist.

• Russian researchers believe 1/1000ths of mG (milliGauss) should be the standard.

• In the US, where the usual background level of 60 Hz magnetic field is 0.5 mG, most states have adopted a 3 mG cutoff point.

• The US Environmental Protection Agency proposes a safety standard of 1 mG.

• Sweden has set a maximum safety limit of 1 mG.

• When electricians try to solve a magnetic field problem they do their best to drop the level to 1 mG or below (Robert O. Becker, MD, in Cross Currents: The Perils of Electro pollution, 1990)

• Dr Nancy Wertheimer, a PhD epidemiologist who has been studying EMF exposure for 20 years, suggests a cutoff point of 1 mG.

• Health studies indicate that electromagnetic fields over 100 mG can most certainly produce health effects. Fields as low as 1 mG can be dangerous if body exposure is for a long period of time. (1991)

• The state of Florida in US has set a 250 mG maximum on the edge of their power line right-of-ways. (1991)

• Several international authorities (such as International Commission on Non-lionizing Radiation and European Committee for Electro technical Standardization) have also set safety limits for public and occupational EMF exposure to 50-60 Hz.

"The United States is wired with 500,000 miles of high-voltage power lines. Industry, government, and military depend on 250,000 microwave relay links. Airliners see and are seen via radar. 9,000,000 broadcasting transmitters and microwave relay stations, and 30,000,000 CB radios flood our airways. Industry employs 35,000,000 electromagnetic devices. As a result, a typical American now gets a daily dosage of electromagnetic radiation up to 200 million times more intense than what his ancestors took in from the sun, stars, and other natural sources." (Lowell Ponte in the article, "The Menace if Electric Smog")

More at: http://www.alternative-magnetic-therapy.com/emf-exposure.html

Metal In Your Body Raises EMF Sensitivity!

More EMF News from Dr. Mercola!

This article from Dr. Mercola talks about EMF Radiation sensitivity and how heavy metals in your body can increase your reaction to EMF around you.

Heavy Metal Toxicity Raises Your Risk of Electromagnetic Sensitivity

By Dr. Mercola

Electomagnetic fields (EMFs) are all around us, no matter where you live these days.  They emanate from power lines, televisions, household electrical wiring, appliances and microwaves.

They come from cell phones, cell phone towers and wireless Internet connections.

It is estimated that 3-8 percent of populations in developed countries experience serious electrohypersensitivity symptoms, while 35 percent experience mild symptoms, according to Dr. Thomas Rau, medical director of the world-renowned Paracelsus Clinic in Switzerland.¹

There are a number of factors that influence the degree to which you may be affected by EMFs.

For example, your body weight, body-mass index, bone density, and water and electrolyte levels can alter the conductivity and biological reactivity to EMFs. Heavy metals in your brain also act as micro-antennas, concentrating and increasing reception of EMF radiation.

How Heavy Metal Toxicity May Make Electrohypersensitivity Worse

The issue of heavy metal toxicity in relation to electromagnetic toxicity may be one of the most significant. According to Dr. Yoshiaki Omura’s research, the more your system is contaminated with heavy metals from silver amalgam fillings, eating contaminated fish, living downstream from coal burning power plants and so forth, the more your body becomes a virtual antenna that actually concentrates radiation, making it far more destructive.²

 Likewise, any kind of metal implants and/or amalgam (silver) tooth fillings will significantly increase reception of microwaves, and the mircrocurrents from cell phones and other ambient fields. In case you’re wondering how to detect electrohypersensitivity, the five most common symptoms are:

1. Skin itch/rash/flushing/burning, and/or tingling
2. Confusion/poor concentration, and/or memory loss
3. Fatigue and weakness
4. Headache
5. Chest pain and heart problems

Read the whole article at:http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/08/25/heavy-metal-electromagnetic-fields.aspx?e_cid=20120825_DNL_artNew_2

Many people are complaining about unexplained pains and fatigue as we continue to fill our homes and work spaces with electronic devices emitting EMF radiation. There are solutions to the radiation problem and they can be used to reduce or eliminate your exposure.

Find out more at this link.

Wi-Fi EMF BLUES!

Wi-Fi is Everywhere

This Article from the National Post talks about the ongoing wi-fi radiation  discussion. There's no doubt that wi-fi has brought great changes in our ability to access data. Is this at the cost of our health and that of our children? Keep watching for the news on these health issues.

NATIONAL POST

Tom Blackwell | Aug 11, 2012 2:40 PM ET | Last Updated: Aug 11, 2012 2:41 PM ET

More from Tom Blackwell | @tomblackwellNP

Sick of Wi-Fi: The debate over wireless safety is not going away

Every week now, Dr. Riina Bray sees two or three new patients with a similar array of ailments and ends up blaming the same, controversial cause.

Suffering from stabbing headaches, “brain fog,” tinnitus or extreme fatigue, their symptoms seem linked to exposure to Wi-Fi routers, cellphone towers and other sources of radio-frequency radiation, says the environmental health specialist at Toronto’s prestigious Women’s College Hospital.

Dr. Bray’s clinic may be the only mainstream medical facility in Canada that routinely treats patients for a condition known as electromagnetic hypersensitivity. She recently held a seminar to educate physicians about what she calls a major and fast-growing public-health menace, paralleling the explosion of wireless technology in Western society.

“Every year we are getting more and more people coming in,” said Dr. Bray. “I’m very concerned, because the stories are very, very compelling … These are not crazy people. There is a huge, huge problem.”

More at: http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/08/11/sick-of-wi-fi-the-debate-over-its-safety-is-not-going-away/

People have different levels of sensitivity to electromagnetic signals and the possible radiation from these devices.. Some are not affected by EMF while others are developing major health symptoms. Check your own home for the presence of EMF and the possible exposure to you and loved ones. 

You can find some protection by looking here.

Symptoms of Electromagnetic Radiation Exposure

Electromagnetic Radiation Exposure!

This article from Natural News talks about Electromagnetic Radiation levels now and in the past. Check out the article and see if you notice any of the symptoms present in your body or of your children.

Levels of electromagnetic radiation we are exposed to today are billions of times higher than our ancestors

Tuesday, June 26, 2012 by: Lloyd Burrell


Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/036295_radiation_exposure_side_effects.html#ixzz23HGNWh1Z 

This is the claim of Dr. Kerry Crofton, PhD. She goes on to say, "We don't have to give up all electronic devices, but we do need to use them differently. First, we need to understand that the government standards we assume are protecting us are thousands of times too lenient, and there are biological effects from these 'safe' levels." The effects of these exposures are particularly an issue for concern for our children.

Some of these effects are thought to include:

• Unexplained headaches/nosebleeds
• Autism
• Insomnia
• Nausea/dizziness
• Anxiousness/ heart palpitations/other 'unexplained' cardiac symptoms
• Ringing ears
• Immune suppression
• Electro-sensitivity
• Children's leukemia
• An increased risk for brain cancer/neurological disorders

Children are at a greater disadvantage than adults due to thinner skulls, smaller brains, and the potential of long-term exposure. The effects for children expand to include retarded learning and performance impairment.

David Carpenter, MD, Director of the Institute for Health and the Environment, School of Public Health, University of Albany, New York, believes, along with many other public health experts, the current scientific evidence shows there will be widespread cancers ahead as a consequence of using cell phones and WiFi without any restrictions.

Unnecessary Exposure

The Northside Independent School District in Texas is on the verge of utilizing a radio frequency ID system in two of its schools. This is another source of electromagnetic radiation exposure for children as this system emits dangerous radio waves. The hope is to implement the strategy to track kids at all of the district's 112 campuses covering approximately 100,000 youth.


Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/036295_radiation_exposure_side_effects.html

We don't know that all of these devices are safe and the ongoing debate is nothing to dismiss. Electromagnetic Radiation is a real concern and it's best to protect yourself and loved ones from the possibility that that the radiation levels from electronics is dangerous to your health. Find some protection at this link.

Does Your Child Have a Cell Phone?

Children Have A High Risk From EMF!

This article was posted late last year but the message is a strong argument for protecting your child from EMF!

HEALTH ALERT FOR CHILDREN WHO USE MOBILE PHONES

Wednesday November 9,2011

By Nathan Rao

URGENT action is needed to curb childrens’ use of mobile phones because of fears they can cause cancer and a host of other illnesses, experts said last night.

An estimated eight out of 10 youngsters aged between seven and 11 now have their own mobile and ownership is also spiralling among those even younger.

But British charity MobileWise says use of the gadgets must be restricted because the young are more at risk from potentially dangerous radiation.

The campaign group is calling on the Government and the mobile phone industry to step up warnings over the devices.

Following an in-depth study of 200 scientific papers, MobileWise says health chiefs are ignoring negative findings and are not doing enough to warn parents of the dangers.

MobileWise director Vicky Fobel said: “We have a choice. We can either continue to ignore the mounting evidence of risks and do nothing until we have incontrovertible proof that mobiles can damage health or we can take note of this evidence, even if it is still inconclusive, and act to protect children before it is too late.”

We can either continue to ignore the mounting evidence of risks and do nothing until we have incontrovertible proof that mobiles can damage health

MobileWise director Vicky Fobel

The study claims children’s brains can absorb twice the amount of radiation as adults from mobile phones because their skulls are smaller and thinner. It says children who use mobiles are also more likely to develop health problems in adulthood due to a longer exposure during their lifetime.

Dr Lennart Hardell, professor of oncology and cancer epidemiology at Orebro University Hospital, in Sweden, has led several studies on the subject.

He said: “This timely report draws attention to the large body of evidence which links prolonged phone use to health hazards such as brain tumours.

“While further research is still needed, there is certainly enough evidence to warrant urgent action by public health agencies to protect the public, especially children, who are significantly more vulnerable.”

 More at: http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/282592/Health-alert-for-children-who-use-mobile-phones

The news about children's skull thickness and your children's exposure to EMF should be a concern. Don't let wireless industry trick you into thinking all is well. Protect yourself and your loved ones from this possible danger.

You can find cell phone protection here.

"Cell Phone Right to Know Act" in Congress

As the debate continues about cell phones and Cancer, Democrat Rep. Dennis Kucinich introduced a federal bill on Aug. 6th that would create a national research program to study cell phone radiation levels  and more importantly put warning labels on cell phones.

H.R. 6358, the Cell Phone Right to Know Act, a bill to grant a consumer’s right-to-know by providing for warning labels on cell phones would also require the Environmental Protection Agency to update the standards for specific absorption rate. SAR is the amount of radio frequency energy absorbed by the body when using a cell phone.

Congress introduces new cell phone radiation warning label law

Congressman Dennis Kucinich, a democrat from Ohio, yesterday introduced a new federal law that would place warning labels on mobile phones and create a U.S. research program to better study overall radiation levels emanating from the devices.

Law number H.R. 6358, named the 'Cell Phone Right to Know Act' would also require the EPA to update the standards for specific absorption rate, or SAR, the amount of radio frequency energy absorbed by the human body when using a cell phone. "It took over 25 years for scientists to be able to say for sure that smoking caused cancer. During all that time, the false impression created by industry supporters was that there was no connection between smoking and cancer, a deception which cost many lives," said Kucinich.

"And while we're still waiting for scientists to sort out the various health effects of cell phone radiation, we must allow consumers to have enough data to select with less radiation. As long as cell phone users may be at increased risk of cancer or reproductive issues, American citizens deserve the right to know the exact radiation levels of any cell phone," said Kucinich.

More at: http://kucinich.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=305900

The Congressman is courageous for bringing up a matter that is hotly contested by the wireless industry who is making massive amounts of money in the cell phone and wireless business. Americans and all citizens of Mother Earth have the right to know about the possibility that Cell Phones may cause Cancer. 

Get some cell phone protection here. Please Tweet out to all your friends!